Judging Criteria
The panel of judges will refer to the below judging criteria to give each question response a score between 0-5. Each of the judging criteria guidelines are applied against the corresponding entry question - for example, JC1 applies to entry question 1: "Provide an outline of your project".
Scores will be assessed against the score sheet outlined below.
In the event of a tie, the tied submissions will be independently accessed by the full panel of judges (4). A preferential voting system will be enacted where each panel member is asked to nominate one (1) story as the winner, with others recognised as Highly Commended. Further terms & Conditions regarding judging and the competition can be found here.
NB: Judges decisions are final. No further correspondence or discussion regarding judging scores/decision will be entered into.
Scores will be assessed against the score sheet outlined below.
In the event of a tie, the tied submissions will be independently accessed by the full panel of judges (4). A preferential voting system will be enacted where each panel member is asked to nominate one (1) story as the winner, with others recognised as Highly Commended. Further terms & Conditions regarding judging and the competition can be found here.
NB: Judges decisions are final. No further correspondence or discussion regarding judging scores/decision will be entered into.
|
Judging Criteria
JC1. Did the submission clearly articulate all aspects of the story and objectives? Score between: 0-5 JC2. Rank how the club/individual addressed the needs of the community through this program/project – consider whether they were proactive or reactive, is there relevance or opportunity to a longer-term partnership that will benefit the community in years to come etc Score between: 0-5 JC3. Rank the level of contribution/engagement the club/individual demonstrated to ensure the success of the project/program Score between: 0-5 JC4. Rank how well the objectives were achieved through implementation of the project/program to address the community needs Score between: 0-5 JC5. In terms of meeting community need and generating outcomes, rank the impact the project/program had Score between: 0-5 |
Score Sheet
0 = Disqualified: (Didn’t address the question or submitted entry in an alternate format; e.g. PDF) 1 = Does Not Meet Expectations: Did not correctly, or accurately address the question. 2 = Below Expectations: Addressed some of the question/s but failed to provide all details/aspects. 3 = Meets Expectations: Response adequately addresses the requirements of each question at a basic level. 4 = Exceeds Most Expectations: Has answered all aspects of the question and in some areas, provided additional information. 5 = Exceeds All Expectations: Has answered all aspects of the question and in all areas of the question, provided additional information pertinent to the program/project. |